I search through various news sources every day to bring readers the latest news pertaining to the environment. And as much as I try to be unbiased or non-judgmental, I just couldn’t believe it when I saw the Yahoo! News headline “Environmentally Friendly Bombs Planned.”
After the initial shock of the headline, I decided to read the article first to try and understand the sense in using eco-friendly bombs that would destroy things over toxic bombs that would destroy things.
Here’s a summary of the article:
Instead of using TNT, RDX and other common explosives that contain carbon, they decided to use a safer class of materials called tetrazoles, which contain nitrogen.
The results of the “safer” explosions were less toxicity and pollution in the environment. And by mixing the two tetrazoles known as HBT and G2ZT with oxidizers, the bombs also avoided releasing hydrogen cyanide gas, which regular bombs usually emit after exploding.
Quoted German researcher Thomas Klapötke, “These compounds have great potential, especially for large caliber naval and tank guns."
You can read the entire article here.
I’m hoping that I’m not the only one who finds this “discovery” quite disturbing.
Instead of writing out my opinion (which would be long), I came up with a few questions for these scientists to think about:
But I still have faith in the advancement of technology. Maybe one day people will build zero emissions electric Hummers that will be used to transport food to impoverished third-world countries.
Your guide to greener living
Share your green achievements
The worldwide green movement
How to live green on campus
Explore green terms